Minh Hua
Chief People Officer and Behavioral Economics Leader
Not specified
Episode 279
AI Demands It: Transform HR with Behavioral Science, Not Politics
Current chapter: Covering monthly expenses is the number one concern for employees in 2024
Built By PeopleMarch 11, 2025 · 10:45
Thesis
“HR must transform from a political function to an empirically driven discipline, integrating behavioral science and A/B testing to gain deeper insights into employee motivation, productivity, and the future workforce, especially in the era of AI.”
Show notes
Minh Hua has a direct diagnosis of what's wrong with HR: "The HR function needs to be less political. It's largely a political function — and functions that don't deal with revenue, products, or technology, and don't have an empirical basis, tend to be political." His prescription is behavioral science. And A/B testing. And hiring someone whose entire job is measuring human behavior.
With a background spanning psychology, GE, and the Clinton-era welfare reform work, Minh brings a research orientation to HR that is genuinely rare. His two most provocative findings from behavioral science practice: First, that employees default to the conservation of energy — saved commute time from RTO debates rarely converts into increased business output, because humans naturally redistribute recovered energy toward comfort, not productivity. Policymakers who assume that two hours of reclaimed commute equals two hours of extra work are operating on an assumption the data doesn't support. Second: when employees ask for feedback, they are, in most cases, asking to be validated. Not critiqued. The leaders who don't understand that will design feedback processes that collect bad data — and use that data to make consequential decisions.
His prescription for evidence-based HR is practical: hire a behavioral scientist who has actually run field experiments. Build a culture of A/B testing for both large and small decisions. Require contra arguments on every major proposal. And on the trust front — he's unambiguous: the management-employee trust gap is the most urgent organizational problem in the AI era. Don't fix it, and watch the union numbers climb.
What you'll learn:
- Why HR is a political function by default — and what shifts when you introduce empirical discipline
- How behavioral economics explains why RTO mandates often fail to produce the productivity gains companies expect
- The "feedback-as-validation" insight: what it means for performance management and leader coaching
- How to build an evidence-based HR practice: field experiments, A/B testing, and contra arguments
- Why deep expertise — not well-roundedness — is the higher-value career investment in most markets
- The management-employee trust gap in the AI era — and what happens to organizations that ignore it
Previ is a private pricing network, free for companies to launch, that saves employees $2,200/year on essential services like cell phone and auto insurance. Learn more here.
What you'll take away
- 1HR must shift from political decision-making to an empirically driven approach, using behavioral science to understand and optimize employee behavior.
- 2Implement evidence-based HR by hiring experts in field experiments, requiring contra arguments for proposals, and fostering a culture of A/B testing for both large and small decisions.
- 3Understand that employees often default to energy conservation, and feedback requests frequently seek validation, not just critical input, which should inform management practices.
- 4Higher-paying career opportunities tend to value deep expertise over general well-roundedness, guiding aspiring professionals.
- 5Prepare for significant market displacement driven by AI by prioritizing personal financial resilience through saving money and living below your means.
What most organizations get wrong
- •The HR function needs to be less political; it is currently largely a political function lacking empirical basis.
- •When people or employees ask for feedback, most of the time, in most cases, they're asking to be validated.
- •The higher paying jobs value deep expertise more than well-roundedness.
In Minh's words
“the HR function needs to be less political. It is right now largely a political function. And functions that don't deal with revenue, don't deal with technology or products, and don't have a lot of empirical basis tends to be political.”
This quote challenges the existing operational model of HR, advocating for a fundamental shift towards an empirically driven approach.
“From that, I learned the power of a job and the dignity it gives when you could earn your own way. So that's kind of how my career started. We didn't call it HR at the time, but it was very transferable to HR.”
It highlights a foundational understanding of intrinsic employee motivation and the value of work, stemming from early career experiences.
“The first is that the law of conservation of mass energy exists in sociology, meaning people, employees, including me and you, most of us in most incidents will default to the conservation of energy.”
This provides a surprising behavioral science lens on employee effort and productivity, challenging assumptions about how time saved translates to work output.
“When people or employees ask for feedback, most of the time, in most cases, they're asking to be validated.”
Offers a critical insight into the psychological motivation behind feedback requests, suggesting a need for a more nuanced leadership response.
“I think we need to fix the trust issue between management and employees. If we don't, we'll see a resurgence of unions, especially within democratic nations.”
This quote identifies a significant, systemic challenge for modern organizations and warns of potential consequences if trust issues are not addressed.
“You can only be a free thinker if you have F.U. money.”
A memorable and provocative statement linking financial independence to the ability to exercise independent thought and career agency.
The problems this episode addresses
- •Many HR practices are political rather than empirically driven, leading to ineffective decisions and a lack of measurable impact on business outcomes.
- •There is a significant trust deficit between management and employees, which could lead to a resurgence of unionization and increased workplace friction.
- •Traditional performance management techniques, especially when implemented in an environment of fear or lack of trust, yield inaccurate and unreliable data for critical decisions like job elimination.
- •Policies like 'return to office' often fail to translate saved commute time into increased business productivity, due to the human tendency towards energy conservation.
- •Current AI/large language models are not sufficiently trained to handle the complexities and nuances of performance reviews, risking 'garbage in, garbage out' if used for major workforce decisions.
- •Employees' primary financial concern in 2024 is covering monthly expenses, indicating a widespread need for financial wellness support.
In this episode
Covering monthly expenses is the number one concern for employees in 2024
Built by People
Dave Zirin shares a little bit about his career journey
Your Career Paths
Min: HR needs to be less political and more empirically driven
Six Key Changes for HR in the 21st Century
Can you explain how behavioral economics can be applied to HR practices
How Behavioral Economics Affects HR Decisions
Man, you're publishing research on behavioral science in HR later this year
Give More Feedback
How can HR leaders implement evidence-based practices that actually help employees
How to Make Better Employee Decision-Making
Min, with your unique perspective, having worked at GE and seeing the evolution of HR practices
In the Elevator With Min Lee
Topics covered
Organizations and entities mentioned
Full transcript
Expand transcript (0 words)
Transcript is not available yet.