
Tom Brown
CHRO
Druva
Episode 168
Beyond Fear: The AI Job Transformation Demands Learning and Risk-Taking
Current chapter: Built by People podcast features insights from world's top HR leaders
May 30, 2025 · 8:29
Thesis
“The future impact of AI on jobs is largely unknown, but organizations and individuals must proactively embrace learning, curiosity, and responsible risk-taking to leverage AI's augmenting benefits and navigate its societal transformation, rather than succumbing to fear.”
Show notes
The World Economic Forum says AI will create tens of millions of jobs. Goldman Sachs says it will eliminate hundreds of millions. Tom Brown's response to this sprawling uncertainty is disarmingly direct: "We don't know." And that, he argues, is exactly why curiosity is the only defensible strategy right now.
As CHRO at Druva — a cloud data protection company he's helped grow across multiple continents — Tom brings a global perspective to the AI-in-HR conversation that goes beyond the usual talking points. He's not interested in managing fear through reassurance. He's more interested in building organizations where employees are genuinely curious about what AI can do, willing to experiment, and supported by guardrails that let exploration happen safely. At Druva, that looks like an AI task force structured around "we want this to happen," not "we need to control whether it happens." The difference in organizational posture is significant — and the outcomes in functions like customer service have been measurable.
Tom's parting observation is worth sitting with: the employees who struggle most with AI transitions tend to be the ones most paralyzed by fear of it. The ones who thrive are typically those who got curious early, took some risks, and started building fluency before they felt ready. The window for that kind of proactive positioning is still open — but not indefinitely.
- Why no one actually knows what AI will do to employment — and why honesty about that uncertainty is better HR leadership than false confidence
- AI as augmentation, not replacement — how Druva reframed the narrative for employees to shift from fear to curiosity
- The AI task force model — building an internal function oriented toward "we want this" rather than "we're worried about this"
- Customer service as a case study — how AI shifted team members from administrative burden to higher-value work
- Preparing the workforce without formal training programs — why curiosity and access matter more than structured curricula at this stage
- The cost of being risk-averse about AI — why the most worried employees tend to fare the worst in technological transitions
Previ is a private pricing network, free for companies to launch and maintain, that saves employees $2,200/year on essentials like cell phone and auto insurance. Learn more here.
What you'll take away
- 1The true impact of AI on job creation versus erosion is still uncertain, making adaptability crucial for the workforce.
- 2Individuals and organizations must cultivate curiosity, explore AI's capabilities, and be willing to take calculated risks to stay ahead.
- 3AI can significantly augment roles, enabling employees to shift from administrative tasks to more value-added work, as evidenced in customer services.
- 4Fostering an AI-positive organizational culture that encourages exploration while maintaining checks and balances for data security is key to successful adoption.
- 5Balance the fear of AI's disruptive potential with the consideration of positive societal upsides, such as increased productivity and new work models like the 4-day week.
What most organizations get wrong
- •Tom Brown pushes back on definitive predictions about AI's job impact, emphasizing the wide range of possibilities and the unknown nature of the revolution.
- •He states pragmatically that AI is not only predicted to take jobs but is 'already taking people's jobs away,' countering narratives that solely focus on future or net-positive job creation.
In Tom's words
“we don't know. And there's lots of people out there saying, we know what's going to happen. But if you listen to the reports coming out of the World Economic Forum or Goldman Sachs or McKinsey, the range of possibilities from it's going to add tens of millions of jobs to it's going to erode hundreds of millions of jobs is really clear.”
Highlights the significant uncertainty and wide range of expert predictions regarding AI's impact on employment, challenging confident forecasts.
“AI not only will take people's jobs away, it's already taking people's jobs away. The interesting balance to that is what are the jobs it's going to create? What are the jobs it's going to augment and make better?”
Offers a direct and realistic statement about AI's immediate impact on the workforce, balancing job displacement with creation and augmentation.
“getting as far ahead as we can on knowledge of AI, what AI can do, and the opportunities, rather than getting paralyzed by the fear of what it might deliver societally, is going to be really important. So it's really trying to get people to be curious, to explore, and to take some risks with AI.”
Emphasizes proactive learning, curiosity, and a willingness to experiment as crucial strategies for individuals navigating an AI-driven future.
“it was getting everybody in the team to a certain level and understanding of how AI was going to be used and what the opportunities were for them to see it as a powerful augmentation and not as a potential kind of replacement and an important kind of philosophy to start with.”
Provides a practical example of successful AI implementation by reframing it as an augmentation tool rather than a job threat for employees.
“we have an AI task force in the company. So AI is carefully looked at as we implement it, but it's being looked at from the sector of we want this to happen, not we don't want this to happen.”
Illustrates a progressive and encouraging organizational philosophy towards AI adoption, balancing eagerness with necessary oversight for responsible implementation.
“the folks that tend to do worse are the ones who are most worried about it and therefore the most risk-averse.”
A strong piece of parting advice encouraging proactive engagement and a less risk-averse mindset to benefit from technological revolutions rather than being left behind.
The problems this episode addresses
- •Organizations struggle to effectively address employee anxieties and concerns about AI replacing their jobs.
- •Companies face the challenge of balancing rapid AI implementation with the complex process of workforce transformation and upskilling.
- •The inherent risks of large language models, particularly concerning data scraping and protecting confidential information, pose a significant challenge for safe AI adoption.
- •Cultivating a company culture that encourages curiosity, exploration, and responsible risk-taking with AI, rather than resistance or paralysis by fear, is a key hurdle for HR leaders.
In this episode
Built by People podcast features insights from world's top HR leaders
Built by People
I've had a really interesting career spanning several different countries
How to Start Your Career with a Question
A lot of our conversation today is going to center around AI in HR
In HR: AI and the Future
How does your organization approach the balance between AI implementation and workforce transformation
Tom, how does your organization approach the AI transition?
Tom, when was a time you successfully implemented AI in a department or team
Have You successfully implemented AI in your department?
Microsoft is preparing its workforce for an AI-augmented future
Tom Flannery
Tom, what parting advice would you like to share with our community about augmented reality
Tom Knows: The Future of Work Is Augmented
Topics covered
Organizations and entities mentioned
Full transcript
Expand transcript (0 words)
Transcript is not available yet.