generational differencesGen Z stereotypesreverse mentoring
"The whole goal of our conversation, our objective, is to move from frustration with someone else based on their age to fascination."
What it was about
Generational stereotypes are real patterns worth understanding, but they're dangerous when used as absolutes. The goal for leaders is to move from frustration with people unlike them to fascination, using tools like values clarification and reverse mentoring instead of age-based assumptions.
By the numbers
emotional intelligence ranked #1
top leadership skill gap globally, per a survey in Training Magazine (February edition)
5 generations
number of generations currently in the workplace (per Bureau of Labor Statistics)
36%
Millennials (Gen Y) as the largest generation in the workplace
Key notes
Use generational information as clues to understand teammates, never as absolutes or excuses to stereotype individuals.
Practice reverse mentoring: deliberately ask younger or less-tenured colleagues to teach you something (an app, a skill, a cultural reference) instead of only mentoring downward.
Have new employees (and yourself) complete a values clarification exercise, then go beyond naming shared values to specify how each person wants that value enacted (e.g., which communication method).
The contrarian takeBoomers aren't actually more "stuck" in their values out of stubbornness. Values naturally strengthen with age and experience for everyone, so what looks like generational rigidity is really just a predictable effect of having lived longer, not a character flaw unique to one generation.
Take this back Monday
Do this for your team
Ask a younger teammate to reverse-mentor you on one app or skill this week, instead of only mentoring downward.
Say this in your next leadership meeting
Generational data is a clue for understanding people, not an excuse to stereotype them — the goal is fascination, not frustration.
Watch out for
Assuming all members of a generation share the same traits (stereotyping) instead of treating generational data as a pattern-recognition clue.
Running a DISC or personality/leadership assessment with a team, feeling good about it, and then failing to actually coach or mentor people using that information.
Trying to change stable traits like personality or core values instead of focusing coaching energy on changeable skills like emotional intelligence, perspective, and growth mindset.
Fun fact · Charlotte Strickland
Charlotte has clocked over 45 years in higher education and, in 2004, founded her own compliance-training consulting firm, Strickly Speaking.